On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> One issue here is that plain \d gets less useful because it'll now
> include system catalogs. We could add the additional rule that
> the above statements apply only when a pattern is specified, and
> without a pattern you get just user stuff (so omitting a pattern
> corresponds to pattern "*" with the U modifier, not just "*").
> This would probably make it a bit easier to have exactly the same
> rules across the board.
>
> Again, "\dfS" would be a bit useless, unless we say that the implicit
> U modifier for no pattern doesn't override an explicit S modifier.
>
> Comments? Does this cover all the cases?
So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding
something?
David