Re: and waiting
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24863.1201882580@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на |
|
| Ответы |
Re: Re: |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
> I saw a strange behaviour on one of the production boxes. The
> pg_stat_activity shows a process as <IDLE> and yet 'waiting' !!! On top of
> it (understandably, since its IDLE), there are no entries for this pid in
> pg_locks!
Hmm, I can reproduce something like this by aborting a wait for lock.
It seems the problem is that WaitOnLock() is ignoring its own good
advice, assuming that it can do cleanup work after waiting.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: