Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y'
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y' |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24839.928767967@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y' (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser gram.y'
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Repair recently-introduced error in makeIndexable for LIKE:
>> a non-leading % would be put into the >=/<= patterns. Also, repair
>> longstanding confusion about whether %% means a literal %%. The SQL92
>> doesn't say any such thing, and textlike() knows that, but gram.y didn't.
> Houston, we have a problem. DoMatch has:
> case '%':
> /* %% is the same as % according to the SQL standard */
> /* Advance past all %'s */
> while (*p == '%')
> Don't we want %% to be %?
I looked at the spec, and this piece of code is right: there is nothing
in the spec that says that %% means anything other than two string
pattern matches (which of course has the same effect as one). So I made
gram.y agree.
It could be that people like Microsoft don't follow the spec... can
anyone check this?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: