Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
Дата
Msg-id 24832.1045941723@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> In my testing with PL/R, it reduces the first call to a PL/R function
> (after connecting) from almost 2 seconds, down to about 8 ms.

Hm, pretty significant.  Can you measure any per-fork cost (ie, the loss
incurred by children that don't use PL/R)?  Is there any measurable
benefit for our other PLs (plperl etc)?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] loading libraries on Postmaster startup