Re: Errno checks for rmtree()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Errno checks for rmtree() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24650.1108256353@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Errno checks for rmtree() (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Errno checks for rmtree()
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> + static void
> + rmtree_errno(char *filepath)
> + {
> + if (errno == EACCES)
> + #ifndef FRONTEND
> + elog(LOG, "no permission to remove \"%s\"", filepath);
> + #else
> + fprintf(stderr, "no permission to remove \"%s\"", filepath);
> + #endif
> + else if (errno == EBUSY)
> [ etc ]
This seems awfully bogus: it's incomplete and not in the style of our
other error messages. Why not just one case:
#ifndef FRONTEND
elog(LOG, "could not remove \"%s\": %m", filepath);
#else
fprintf(stderr, "could not remove \"%s\": %s\n", filepath,
strerror(errno));
#endif
Also, I'm unconvinced that LOG is the appropriate error level;
WARNING would probably be better.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: