Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
Дата
Msg-id 2459.1118611672@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's always bothered me too.  How about
>> 
>> REINDEX SYSTEM -> system tables (current meaning of R. DATABASE)
>> REINDEX USER -> all non-system tables
>> REINDEX DATABASE -> both of the above

> Why all the choices?  What cases are there for doing one without the 
> other?  If you want to get 'fine tuned', do a 'REINDEX TABLE' ... I can 
> see REINDEX SYSTEM and REINDEX DATABASE (includes SYSTEM), but not the 
> USER one ..

The main argument I can think of for REINDEX USER is that it could be
executed by someone who isn't necessarily superuser.  Not sure how
important that is, though.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: min/max (was: The Contrib Roundup)