Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number. | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24583.1291743428@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number. (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.
            		
            		 Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.  | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Say what? �He didn't say that, he said "don't assume that user-defined
>> types have hard-wired OIDs".
> Well, you're right, strictly speaking.  Of course, the OP is not
> assuming it, he is enforcing it.
No, he's wishing he could enforce it.  Which will work, mostly, until
the day it doesn't because of a pre-existing collision.  And then he'll
be up the creek with a lot of software that he can't fix readily.  I
concur with Andrew's advice: don't go there in the first place.  Use a
cache to mitigate the costs of looking up user-defined OIDs, and you
won't regret it later.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: