Re: serverless postgresql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: serverless postgresql
Дата
Msg-id 24512.1074201679@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: serverless postgresql  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
Список pgsql-general
David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com> writes:
> Do the developers generally oppose the idea of a threaded (but
> non-embedded) backend as well? If the backend is thread-safe, then users
> can still choose to run multiprocess or multithreaded right?

The backend isn't thread-safe.  There have been repeated discussions
about using threading in the backend (see the pgsql-hackers archives),
but so far no one has made a convincing case for it.

BTW, this whole discussion is getting pretty off-topic for -general;
I'd suggest pursuing it on -hackers.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fixed-length row
Следующее
От: James M Moe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Foreign key question