Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24510.1291483199@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child
Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Those are difficulties, certainly. Are they insurmountable obstacles,
> though? This is something that has been on the TODO list for ages and I
> think is very worth doing, if we can.
They're possibly surmountable with enough effort, though I think in
reality what you'd end up with is annoying corner-case behaviors
(eg, deadlock failures in some cases). Anyway Greg and I seem to
agree on the bottom line: such a feature is not actually interesting
for partitioned tables, as it destroys most of the benefits of
partitioning. I have a feeling that the feature will languish on the
TODO list forever, unless someone comes up with a brilliant idea to
avoid the problems. As is, the return on investment to do it just
isn't there.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: