Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24472.1086188510@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER
Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> How about pg_dumpall dumps all users as superusers, and then changes
> them back to what they're supposed to be at the bottom of the script :)
Leaves you in kind of a dangerous state if the script doesn't complete,
doesn't it?
Someone else suggested having pg_dump dump all objects without ownership
(so, on restore, they'd all initially be owned by the user running the
script, hopefully a superuser) and then doing ALTER OWNERs and GRANTs at
the bottom. This seems a little cleaner to me, though it's got the
problem that somebody would have to go off and implement the remaining
ALTER OWNER commands.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: