Re: Reduce build times of pg_trgm GIN indexes

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 16/04/2026 17:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not excited about making massive changes for this.

> Having all three would be a very localized change in postgres.h.

Sure, but *using* them in a consistent way would be invasive.

>> I remain far less certain than Peter is that this discussion has
>> anything to do with why Coverity is complaining about
>> ginExtractEntries.  I still think we should make some minimum-effort
>> change to see if the complaint goes away before expending a lot of
>> brain cells on choosing a final fix.

> I think I'm going to commit my proposal to turn PointerGetDatum() back 
> into a macro, and see if that makes Coverity happy. Then we'll know, and 
> we can decide on the next steps. Any objections?

WFM.

            regards, tom lane