Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Дата
Msg-id 24361.1153115920@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Ответы Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> i found this on the Monitoring section:
>> o Allow protocol-level BIND parameter values to be logged
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00165.php
>> 
>> But i don't understand why that thread is related to the TODO item,
>> i'm missing something?

> Possibly the message renumbering that Tom griped about:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php

Yeah.  I think the TODO item is intended to point to what is now
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00163.php
or one of the earlier messages in that thread.

Perhaps when Bruce realizes he needs to recheck every link in the
TODO files, he'll get on the warpath with me ;-)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Следующее
От: lawrence.lim@tokuii.com
Дата:
Сообщение: unsubscribe