Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Дата
Msg-id 24328.1115310025@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS 
>> server?  If so, that would work.

> I believe that I can made a 'meta module' that, if I checked it out, would 
> include all sub-modules, and that I can tag/branch appropriately ... if 
> not, its just a matter of looping through each at the same time, a little 
> more work, but not much more ...

Probably not worth the trouble compared to just putting them as
separate top-level directories in the checkout tree.  Our last
experiment with multiple modules didn't go very well.

One thought here --- would we also separate out the documentation for
them?  That would have some negative effects (make the documentation
less seamless) but I'm not sure we'd have any choice.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement