Re: minimal update

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: minimal update
Дата
Msg-id 24321.1194534461@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: minimal update  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Ответы Re: minimal update  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
> What would be the disadvantages of always doing this, i.e., just  
> making this part of the normal update path in the backend?

(1) cycles wasted to no purpose in the vast majority of cases.

(2) visibly inconsistent behavior for apps that pay attention
to ctid/xmin/etc.

(3) visibly inconsistent behavior for apps that have AFTER triggers.

There's enough other overhead in issuing an update (network,
parsing/planning/etc) that a sanely coded application should try
to avoid issuing no-op updates anyway.  The proposed trigger is
just a band-aid IMHO.

I think having it as an optional trigger is a reasonable compromise.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A small rant about coding style for backend functions
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A small rant about coding style for backend functions