Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> If someone wants to define things like that before potentially
> including system headers, they're not going about it the right way if
> they're including our headers first (or anything at all not under
> their direct control). But OK, I can work with the
> not-broken-so-don't-fix-it and
> pulling-in-more-stuff-that-maybe-they-don't-want arguments. :-)
v2 LGTM.
regards, tom lane