Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Дата
Msg-id 24251.1325526107@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> Does anyone have a better idea for reducing BufFreelistLock
> contention? Something simple that will work for 9.2?

Get rid of the freelist?  Once shared buffers are full, it's just about
useless anyway.  But you'd need to think about the test cases that you
pay attention to, as there might be scenarios where it remains useful.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe