Re: Revised signal multiplexer patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Revised signal multiplexer patch
Дата
Msg-id 24211.1249062023@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Revised signal multiplexer patch  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> But there is one issue; the extra search is always required to send a notify
> interrupt. This is because pg_listener doesn't have a backend ID and we
> cannot pass it to SendProcSignal. In order to solve this issue, we should
> newly add backend ID field into pg_listener?

Hmm.  I'm not tremendously concerned about that --- the LISTEN/NOTIFY
code has been on the agenda for a complete rewrite for a long time now,
and I keep hoping pg_listener will go away entirely sometime soon.
I don't feel a need to go and fix a marginal performance issue there.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8.4 win32 shared memory patch