Re: psql \d commands and information_schema

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: psql \d commands and information_schema
Дата
Msg-id 24206.1239229793@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql \d commands and information_schema  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane escribi?:
>>> BTW, I hesitate to mention this and perhaps upset a fragile consensus,
>>> but should we remove the special-case code in \df that tries to hide I/O
>>> functions by excluding functions that take or return cstring?  I think
>>> that its value has largely disappeared given the new overall behavior.
>> 
>> +1

> Agreed.

Done.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NaN support in NUMERIC data type
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GUC inconsistency in 8.4?