Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2016-08-17 21:45:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> guaibasaurus thinks this test is still underdetermined.

> The easiest solution here seems to be another expected file - playing
> around a few minutes, I couldn't see an easier solution. Better ideas?

If you think the two outcomes are equally valid, sure.

You could possibly try to force a single ordering by inserting a sleep
into some step of the test --- we have some other isolation tests that
do it that way.  But it's hard to predict how much sleep is enough.

            regards, tom lane