On 06/09/2017 02:52 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 06:16 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>>>> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions)
>>>> > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition
>>>> > constraint checking. It should be much more straight-forward now, but
>>>> > let me know if there are any further recommended changes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, will take a look towards the end of the day.
>>>
>>> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
>>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
>>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>>
>> I started reviewing the latest patch last night and will try to finish
>> up this afternoon (west coast USA time).
>
> I left the actual (2 line) code change untouched, but I tweaked the
> regression test changes a bit. If there are no complaints I will push
> tomorrow (Saturday).
I waited until Sunday, but pushed none-the-less.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development