default parameters for built-in functions (was Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | default parameters for built-in functions (was Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24148.1239060256@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: default parameters for built-in functions (was Re:
Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior)
Re: default parameters for built-in functions Re: default parameters for built-in functions (was Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Bruce suggested what seemed like an excellent idea, which is to make
> this self-documenting using the new default-arguments feature ---
> it'll look something like this in \df:
> List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
> --------+------+------------------+----------------------------------------
> public | foo | integer | label text, fast boolean DEFAULT false
On poking into this, it's a bit uglier to do than I first thought.
pg_proc.proargdefaults has to be the text representation of an
expression tree. This means that to do it directly in pg_proc.h
would take writing something like
({CONST :consttype 16 :consttypmod -1 :constlen 1 :constbyval true :constisnull false :location -1 :constvalue 1 [ 0 0
00 ]})
Ugly as that is, it gets worse fast: the constvalue representation is
machine-dependent, both as to width and endianness. And maintaining
such things in the face of expression tree changes would be no fun
either.
So I think that's out. The only alternative that comes to mind is
to have initdb issue an additional SQL command to establish the default
after the bootstrap phase; that is, something like
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_start_backup(label text, fast boolean DEFAULT false) RETURNS text LANGUAGE internal
STRICTAS 'start_backup';
in system_views.sql or some such place.
Or we could just not bother with using a default here (ie, go back to
declaring two pg_proc entries). It's not buying us all that much.
Comments?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: