"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu> writes:
> Hmm, with the new dependency code, is the auto-sequence from a SERIAL
> in a temp table also a temp sequence? It get's put in the temp schema,
> right? Seems we have a workaround for those wanting numbered result
> sets.
That's the hard way; just do CREATE TEMP SEQUENCE ... works in prior
releases too ...
regards, tom lane