Re: Random not so random
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Random not so random |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2409.1096923106@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Random not so random ("D. Stimits" <stimits@comcast.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"D. Stimits" <stimits@comcast.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm. postmaster.c does this during startup of each backend process:
>>
>> gettimeofday(&now, &tz);
>> srandom((unsigned int) now.tv_usec);
> If it uses the same seed from the connection, then all randoms within a
> connect that has not reconnected will use the same seed. Which means the
> same sequence will be generated each time, which is why it is
> pseudo-random and not random. For it to be random not just the first
> call of a new connection, but among all calls of new connection, it
> would have to seed it based on time at the moment of query and not at
> the moment of connect. A pseudo-random generator using the same seed
> will generate the same sequence.
Did you read what I said? Or experiment?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: