Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, that would be fine, too. What I think is bizarre is that I got
> credit for some things I was barely involved in (like SP-gist) and no
> credit for other things I spent a LOT of time on (like security views
> and some of KaiGai's other stuff), and similarly for other people.
> Similarly, some things I am credited on involve very significant
> contributions from other people and others are cases where I did
> nearly all the work. I think it's weird to lump all those cases
> together without any distinction.
Well, you know, these are *draft* release notes. Feel free to correct
them anywhere you believe they are inaccurate.
I think the bigger issue here is that we don't seem to have consensus
about whether to include reviewers' names. Bruce evidently thinks
that's a good idea, else he wouldn't have done it, but I only recall one
other person speaking in favor of it. Everybody else seems to think
that it'll be too verbose.
regards, tom lane