Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24026.1307631594@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee
> <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different
>>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this
>>> to become an issue? �How long is it taking?
>> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50
scalefactor and 50 clients
> Wow, that's slow. Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of
> comparable size? It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of
> work.
I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: