Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24014.1215189468@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 8.3 planner handling of IS NULL in aggregations
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes:
> I've just noticed that the planner in 8.3.3 doesn't seem to realize the
> difference in the result of the following:
> GROUP BY col;
> GROUP BY col IS NULL;
Yeah, estimate_num_groups doesn't have any special knowledge about IS
NULL -- it just sees this as "an expression involving col". The
general assumption about that is that the expression doesn't reduce
the number of groups (think "col + 1" for example). In general I'd
rather it overestimated the number of groups than underestimated,
so I don't think this heuristic is really wrong.
Putting in a special case for IS NULL seems a bit silly, but maybe
checking for a boolean result type would cover enough real-world
uses to be worth the trouble? Not sure.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: