Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24006.1221483138@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook
Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Indexes have always been able to be added dynamically. Now they can be
>> recovered correctly as well.
> Hm, so currently if you want to add a new indexam you can't just insert into
> pg_am and make them recoverable. You basically have to build in your new index
> access method into Postgres with the new rmgr. That is annoying and a problem
> worth tackling.
I concur with Heikki that that's not exactly a compelling use-case.
I've never heard of anyone building a non-core index AM at all; much
less trying to use it in a production context. Given the obvious
potential for version-mismatch-type problems, it's hard to believe
that anyone ever would try.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: