Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types
Дата
Msg-id 23FD7624-3255-4582-A3D4-1E7DB54AE737@decibel.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Ответы Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> You can already use "char" to store 1 byte values, though unless
> there are
> several of these in a row, you won't save any space because of
> alignment.

<nitpick>There's also boolean...</nitpick>

Is there any technical reason why we don't support unsigned ints or
tinyint? Just a matter of no one feeling the itch?
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Brien R. Givens"
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #2818: ADO Field.Attributes reports NULL on NOT NULL fields
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types