Re: Open items
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Open items |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23966.1120186725@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Open items (Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto@yahoo.com.br>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto@yahoo.com.br> writes:
>> I think that moving rtree_gist, reindexdb, and/or userlock into core
>> would have to happen before feature freeze,
> [snip]
> Are you think in putting reindex at core? I was about to submit a
> replacement of it but if it goes to bin/scripts (for example) I can
> rearrange the patch. Could I?
The redefinition of REINDEX DATABASE is already in. A direct
replacement for reindexdb would basically need to apply this across
all DBs in the cluster, which is definitely a job for bin/scripts.
I was speculating that maybe it'd make more sense to handle it as
an option to vacuumdb or clusterdb instead of a whole new program,
but it's up to you if you're doing the work.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: