Re: log_min_duration_statement units
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: log_min_duration_statement units |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23945.1239144239@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: log_min_duration_statement units (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: log_min_duration_statement units
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> My English is not as good as yours but here is another try. Personally, I
>> prefer the second one but...
> Great, I used your second version. I had already done some of the ones
> you found, but you had many more. I also used your "0 disables" wording
> consistently in the file. Thanks for the help. Committed.
You know, it suddenly strikes me that this is going in largely the wrong
direction. Wasn't a key part of the reasoning for the GUC units support
to *eliminate* the need for people to know what the underlying
variable's unit is? I certainly think that putting the unit info into
the text descriptions is a seriously bad idea. It makes an already
overly wide view even wider, and the information is 100% redundant with
the "unit" column of the pg_settings view.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: