Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I could make the whole dataset available, but tarred and zipped it's
> about 300Mb. The reason I used this dataset was that I wanted to see a
> test that took many seconds, and Merlin's did not - I wanted to see how
> any performance gain scaled.
Well, you tried to "scale" into a domain where the performance is going
to be disk-I/O-limited, so I'm not sure it proves anything.
regards, tom lane