Re: pg_checksums: Reorder headers in alphabetical order
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_checksums: Reorder headers in alphabetical order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 238b123f-0965-4ac7-9894-9300f01fd477@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_checksums: Reorder headers in alphabetical order (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_checksums: Reorder headers in alphabetical order
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024/09/21 12:09, Tom Lane wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes: >> I don’t have any objections to this commit, but I’d like to confirm >> whether we really want to proactively reorder #include directives, >> even for standard C library headers. > > I'm hesitant to do that. We can afford to insist that our own header > files be inclusion-order-independent, because we have the ability to > fix any problems that might arise. We have no ability to do something > about it if the system headers on $random_platform have inclusion > order dependencies. (In fact, I'm fairly sure there are already > places in plperl and plpython where we know we have to be careful > about inclusion order around those languages' headers.) > > So I would tread pretty carefully around making changes of this > type, especially in long-established code. I have no reason to > think that the committed patch will cause any problems, but > I do think it's mostly asking for trouble. Sounds reasonable to me. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: