Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
> Agreed.
> What about the messages in configure?
> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
> from CVS nor"
I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
regards, tom lane