Re: autovacuum next steps, take 3

ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In any case, I still haven't seen a good case made why a global work
>> queue will provide better behavior than each worker keeping a local
>> queue.

> If we have some external vacuum schedulers, we need to see and touch the
> content of work queue.

Who said anything about external schedulers?  I remind you that this is
AUTOvacuum.  If you want to implement manual scheduling you can still
use plain 'ol vacuum commands.
        regards, tom lane