----- Original Message -----
> From: Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>
> To: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>
> Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2016, 22:08
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Clarification on using pg_upgrade
>
> Right, that's what we do, but then to upgrade, we have to drop/add the
> node, because it's being upgraded. If I'm updating the underlying OS,
> I have to kill it all. If I'm doing a postgres upgrade, using an old
> version of slon, without using pg_upgrade, I have to drop the db,
> recreate it, which requires a drop/add.
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to best do it using pg_upgrade instead
> of the entire drop/add for postgres upgrades (which are needed if you
> are using slon as an upgrade engine for your db).
>
I've just skimmed through this thread, but I can't quite gather what it is you're trying to achieve. Are you looking
tomove away from Slony? Upgrade by any means with or without Slony? Or just find a "fast" way of doing a major upgrade
whilstkeeping Slony in-place as your replication method?
If it's the latter, the easiest way is to have 2 or more subscribers subscribed to the same sets and one at a time;
dropa subscriber node, upgrade and re-initdb, then use clone node to recreate it from another subscriber. If you're
intenton using pg_upgrade you might be able to fudge it as long as you can bump up current txid to be greater than what
itwas before the upgrade; in fact I've done similar before with a slony subscriber, but only as a test on a small
database.