Re: Terminal width for help output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Terminal width for help output
Дата
Msg-id 23741.1195160686@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Terminal width for help output  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Terminal width for help output  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's 
> \?)?  I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we 
> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?

I think 79 is still a reasonable maximum.  AFAIK 80 columns is still a
pretty standard terminal window width, but if you try to print in the
last column you may get unexpected extra blank lines.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Terminal width for help output
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Terminal width for help output