Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR
Дата
Msg-id 23726.1090456819@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> PITR should cope with these scenarios. These are described reasonably
> closely but not as exact mechanical tests, so as to ensure that if
> multiple solutions exist to these recovery scenarios that all paths are
> tested.

> [ snip ... ]

Now *my* head is hurting ;-)

AFAICS, we should be able to handle all of these cases, as long as
(a) the DBA doesn't manually delete any xlog files (else he probably
loses the chance to recover to the associated timeline), and
(b) the DBA doesn't screw up on picking which timeline to recover to.

I'd guess that (b) is likely to be the bigger threat :-(.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: check point segments leakage ?
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PreallocXlogFiles