Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs
Дата
Msg-id 23723.1175089590@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> writes:
> We use DSPAM as one of our anti-spam options. Its UPDATE pattern is to
> increment a spam counter or a not-spam counter while keeping the user and
> token information the same. This would benefit from this optimization.

Would it?  How wide is the "user and token" information?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring
Следующее
От: "Florian G. Pflug"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs