Re: Add BF member koel-like indentation checks to SanityCheck CI
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add BF member koel-like indentation checks to SanityCheck CI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2368400.1704873497@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add BF member koel-like indentation checks to SanityCheck CI (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add BF member koel-like indentation checks to SanityCheck CI
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:54 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Yeah. I'm not quite sure what's a good way to make this work, but >> it seems like having "make check-world" always invoke it would not >> be desirable. Making that conditional on an environment variable >> setting could be a better idea, perhaps? > It's easy to miss setting the environment variable and eventually end > up with code incompatible with pgindent committed. Well, we expect committers to know what they're doing. I'm not quite suggesting that committers add "export I_AM_A_PG_COMMITTER=1" in their ~/.profile and then have the Makefiles check that to decide what tests are invoked by "make check-world" ... but it doesn't seem like a totally untenable idea, either. > IMO, running the > pgindent in at least one of the CI systems if not all (either as part > task SyanityCheck or task Linux - Debian Bullseye - Autoconf) help > catches things early on in CF bot runs itself. This saves committers > time but at the cost of free run-time that cirrus-ci provides. But that puts the burden of pgindent-cleanliness onto initial patch submitters, which I think is the wrong thing for reasons mentioned upthread. We want to enforce this at commit into the master repo, but I fear enforcing it earlier will drive novice contributors away for no very good reason. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: