Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> In that case I'm betting Robert broke it somewhere in the unlogged-table
>>> changes.
>> Yeah, looks like it. Will investigate.
> I committed a localized fix for this. Basically, it now double-checks
> that the schema name isn't the one that would have been forced by the
> temp-ness, and doesn't throw an error if they match.
Keeping in mind that this worked before ... did you take the approach of
seeing exactly why it worked before, and why your changes broke it?
The patch you committed looked like it was introducing the functionality
from scratch, which should not have been the case.
regards, tom lane