On 06/05/2018 08:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
>> On 06/05/2018 04:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm getting a little tired of people raising hypothetical harms and
>>> ignoring the real harms that we're hoping to fix. Yes, this is an
>>> experiment and it may not work, but we can't find out without trying.
>>> If it turns out to be a net loss, we'll modify it or abandon it.
>
>> Good to hear this is considered an experiment.
>
>> To that end will there be quarterly/yearly reports, suitably anonymized,
>> that spell out the activity that took place with reference to the CoC?
>
> That seems like a good idea from here. I don't know exactly how much
> can be reported without risking privacy issues, but surely we could at
> least provide the number of incidents and how they were resolved.
Yeah I like it too. We don't have to give out any confidential
information but it adds to the transparency and allows the community as
a whole to see that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****