Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2358226.1726807096@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold
Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 11:51:49AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote: >> Should you also bump the catalog version? > No need to worry about that when sending a patch because committers > take care of that when merging a patch into the tree. Doing that in > each patch submitted just creates more conflicts and work for patch > authors because they'd need to recolve conflicts each time a > catversion bump happens. And that can happen on a daily basis > sometimes depending on what is committed. Right. Sometimes the committer forgets to do that :-(, which is not great but it's not normally a big problem either. We've concluded it's better to err in that direction than impose additional work on patch submitters. If you feel concerned about the point, best practice is to include a mention that catversion bump is needed in your draft commit message. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: