Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23567.1263482210@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV ("Justin Pitts" <justinpitts@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV | 
| Список | pgsql-bugs | 
Justin Pitts <jpitts@bplglobal.net> writes:
> My guess is that I am not provoking a 'SI queue overrun'
The 100 temp table creations probably will do that just fine.
> Am I completely off base about how this should be reproducing?
Two points: the session you hope to have crash *must* be in serializable
mode, and the crash would actually happen in the transaction after the
one that's rolled back.
The error doesn't have to be a serialization error, so in principle
you should be able to make it fail with something as simple as
    begin;
    select 1/0;
    rollback;
    select * from foo;
as long as the ROLLBACK is done with a prepared statement and you've
forced a SI overrun since the ROLLBACK was prepared.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: