"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Currently, it seems that most or all of the entries are links to
>> archived messages. Scraping the date from the underlying message
>> would be the best thing.
> Just for purposes of conversion, or as a long-term behavior?
Well, right at the moment I was just thinking of the conversion problem,
but it wouldn't be a horrible idea to make it a permanent behavior for
entries that include a message reference.
regards, tom lane