Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23534.1472212411@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice() |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't have strong feelings about this. Technically, this issue
> affects 9.5 also, because pqmq.c was introduced in that release. I
> don't think we want to add another error field in a released branch.
> However, since there's no parallel query in 9.5, only people who are
> accessing that functionality via extension code would be affected,
> which might be nobody and certainly isn't a lot of people, so we could
> just leave this unfixed in 9.5.
After sleeping on it, I think the right answer is to introduce the new
error-message field (and not worry about 9.5). Will work on a patch
for that, unless I hear objections pretty soon.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: