Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2349.943024064@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_dump bug (jose soares <jose@sferacarta.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
jose soares <jose@sferacarta.com> writes:
> I think I found a bug in pg_dump:
It's not pg_dump's fault; it's just putting out what's in the system
tables, and "date( 'current'::datetime + '0 sec')" is how the 6.5.*
parser translates DEFAULT CURRENT_DATE. (Which is inconsistent with
how it translates CURRENT_DATE in other contexts, but nevermind.)
The failure actually comes up because the 6.5.* parser can't cope with
"x::y"-style typecasts in default expressions; it translates them to
a syntactically invalid string. CAST ... AS doesn't work either, BTW.
I have ripped out and rewritten all of that cruft for 7.0, which is why
it works now (more or less). I dunno if it's worth trying to patch
around this particular bug in the default-handling code in 6.5.*.
It's got so many others :-(
Current sources still have a problem with this example, which is that
the default expression gets prematurely constant-folded:CREATE TABLE ut (d1 DATE DEFAULT CURRENT_DATE);
pg_dumps asCREATE TABLE "ut" ( "d1" date DEFAULT '11-19-1999'::date);
Drat. I thought I'd taken care of that class of problems...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: