Re: FlexLocks

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote:
>> I just don't see the reason to do a global search and replace on
>> the lwlock name
> I was going to review further before commenting on that, but since
> it has now come up -- it seems odd that a source file which uses
> only LW locks needs to change so much for the FlexLock
> implementation.

Yeah, -1 on wideranging source changes for me too.  There is no reason
that the current LWLock API need change.  (I'm not saying that it has
to be same ABI though --- macro wrappers would be fine.)
        regards, tom lane