Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 23409.1385048774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Status of FDW pushdowns (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Re: Status of FDW pushdowns |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I know join pushdowns seem insignificant, but it helps to restrict what
>> data must be passed back because you would only pass back joined rows.
> By 'insignificant' you mean 'necessary to do any non-trivial real
> work'. Personally, I'd prefer it if FDW was extended to allow
> arbitrary parameterized queries like every other database connectivity
> API ever made ever.
[ shrug... ] So use dblink. For better or worse, the FDW stuff is
following the SQL standard's SQL/MED design, which does not do it
like that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: