Re: is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra?
Дата
Msg-id 2340.1565192372@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra?  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Re: is necessary to recheck cached data in fn_extra?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I should to use a cache accessed via fn_extra. There will be stored data
> about function parameters (types). If I understand correctly, these data
> should be stable in query, and then recheck is not necessary. Is it true?

I wouldn't trust that.  You don't really know what the lifespan of
a fn_extra cache is.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows
Следующее
От: Sehrope Sarkuni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)