Re: Async Commit, v21 (now: v22)

"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There is an explicit test for whether the transaction has modified
> files; if so the commit is always synchronous, even if explicitly
> requested otherwise. Also, utility commands never perform async commits,
> so overall there aren't that many of the commonly used DDL commands that
> could be performed and still have it be an async commit.

Huh?  I see neither a reason for these restrictions nor any way that you
could enforce them without horrid kluges.

            regards, tom lane